Fisheries deals were required to win concessions from both the slotxo EU and the UK - but that led them to 2026 when the same problem returned.Until then, the British had pushed into Europe's share of the catch quotas, largely for the breeds the British had to export.The penalties for breaking this short-term deal could be severe and indicate that access to European markets would cost access to British waters.Kick the can down by the ways': It is one of the expressions characterizing the Brexit deal for four and a half years as two prime ministers have also struggled to find a way to lower impossible expectations in their own positions. A formidable negotiating team The other side of the table It's not over yet Fisheries were able to abolish Cannery Row until June 30, 2018, it was postponed.
The time before that date may not be long, if the latest experience is any guide, we will get back to the toughest Brexit talks.Some things will change then. UK ships will have an estimated eight or 25% more catch from UK waters than there are at the moment. They will receive £ 100 million from the UK government to expand and update their fleet.And perhaps there are more realistic expectations of what Brexit can achieve.In some ways, the fish was the start of Brexit, a 'spendable' sector of the 1970s that fueled frustration over the next 50 years.In part, it explains why the issue was the last to be resolved - there were still disputes even hours after the Christmas Eve announcement time set for the deal came and passed.And while the negotiator's dispute is over for now But it is one of the ***spam*** controversial components of the outcome. The fishing organization, along with the Scottish National Party, said it was either deeply disappointing or bitter and that the promise had been broken.The UK government acknowledged that some reasons had to be given. But it got what it wanted ***spam***, and for the SNP, the conservatives responded with accusations hat 'hypocrisy' is that the SNP policy is to pull Scotland back into the EU and common fisheries policy.
The "Fish.4 Appendix: Protocol to Access Waters" on page 899 of the EU version of the Agreement states the ***spam*** controversial subject with greater clarity than what you will find on ***spam*** other pages.Use English on The "independent coastal state" exercised "sovereignty" insisting that water-sharing negotiations should be negotiated annually - once again, a British requirement.The European Union takes a view to Fisheries "continue to observe the social and economic benefits of this period of security" and have continued to have access to fisheries over the years.The period was longer than England would need and took less time than the European Union needed to resolve the ***spam*** difficult problem in two short sentences: "Article 1: the time frame of the adjustment will be determined by the timeframe of the change." Modified from 1 January 2021 until 30 June 2026 In the five and a half years, shares will "Compensation" with the number of recent fishing quota and opportunities. Those stocks that are not quota restricted will have to maintain the average weight of the EU captured in UK waters. (And vice versa) from 2012 to 2016, the same or direct replacement vessels must be allowed to enter each other's waters.But then? The answer is on page 274: "Any subsequent changes in the stock ... after June 30, 2026 are related to multilateralism." In other words, return to the negotiating table.
Sprats and pouts
The British have established the issue of sovereignty. But at a time of change, they have been cut far less than British fishermen expected in the European quota.According to the National Fisherman's Confederation, the figures are summarized on Christmas Eve. But it was not shown in the document. The UK ships deal will increase by 25%, Federal officials say 2021 will increase by 15% and from 2022 to 2025 each year there will be only 2.5%.It will not be the same in all species. The annex to the UK-EU agreement defines the change in stocks in various marine areas. Griffin Carpenter fisheries expert from the New Economics Foundation explains that the huge increase in quota for UK ships is a species they are not targeting much at now and There isn't much in the UK market yet. The North Sea increased by 36%, in the west of Scotland, the saithe was up 33%, the English Channel rose by 32%.Likewise, Norway was caught in the North Sea, where British ships would receive a 20% more share of the total catch. But starting with a very low base, that's a 400% increase in the amount they can land.The ***spam*** profitable species are those that Britain's ships already share, and the relative increase in catch quotas is somewhat less: herring, mackerel and whiting, ***spam*** of which.